The blog of the Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues

In clinical trials, questions around community rights

At the final session today of the Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues, one issue that rose repeatedly was the importance of involving the community in discussions around ethical issues in clinical trials.

“A lot of people talked about individual rights and community rights, but how do we take that into consideration and understand more about the community rights?” asked Commission member Dr. Raju Kucherlapati, the Paul C. Cabot Professor in the Harvard Medical School Department of Genetics. “How do you define the community? Is it the town or small city? Is it the country? The world? The implications on how you define this are very important.”

Dr. John R. Williams, a consultant with the World Medical Association, said it was a question that still confounds experts. “It’s an evolving concept,” he said. “It differs from one environment to another. .. In the African context, a tribe, or clan, is pretty well identified with a recognizable leadership. It’s more difficult in the U.S. and Canada where there are large immigrant populations.”

Commission Chair Dr. Amy Gutmann, president of the University of Pennsylvania, had a related question: How important were community rights? She brought up the case of the U.S.-funded Guatemala experiments from 1946-1948 during which investigators deliberately infected trial participants with sexually transmitted diseases and, with some, did not treat them.

“As far as we know in Guatemala, the Guatemalan government agreed to the experiment,” she said. “As we know today, getting the agreement of governments in many cases does not pose a high bar. Raj asked a very, very important question: What is the value you see in community consultation, and at what level is it important?”

Dafna Feinholz, chief of the Bioethics Section, Division of Ethics and Science and Technology, Sector for Social and Human Sciences, United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, said there were several benefits of community partipation.

“The added value is more involvement from the community and knowing better if this (research) is responding to what the needs are,” she said.

That only led to another question – again from Kucherlapati:

“When we think about benefits accruing to the community, how would we consider that? Do we consider only those regions in which trials are conducted, or do we consider the benefits to the world as a whole – drugs that benefit everybody?”

The Commission will be studying the issue of protecting human subjects in domestic and international trials throughout the year and is expected to make its recommendations to President Obama late in the year.

Share this article

1 Comment to In clinical trials, questions around community rights

  1. May 6, 2015 at 12:50 pm | Permalink

    I feel that the most important step in consulting a community is to first educate as much of that community as possible about what is involved in clinical research. Whether the community is based around a certain geography, age group, ethnic group, or patient population (i.e. Asthma, Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, etc.), they should first be made aware of what is entailed in clinical research. What can they expect? What are the processes involved? After a community has been thoroughly educated, let them each, as individuals, decide for themselves whether or not involvement in advancing medical research is the right decision for them.

Leave a Reply

Read the comment policy before posting your comment.

About blog.Bioethics.gov

This is a space for the members and staff of the Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues to communicate with the public about the work of the commission and to discuss important issues in bioethics.

Learn more about the Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues.

Subscribe

You can receive updates about our blog via email subscription, RSS feed, or follow the Bioethics Commission on Twitter.